Road crossings
On this page
Facility selection tool
The online Pedestrian Facility Selection Tool is designed to help practitioners select the most appropriate type of pedestrian crossing based on walkability, safety and economic outcomes.
The tool assesses the viability of different types of pedestrian crossing facilities according to the physical and operational parameters of a site and its safety performance.
It can be used to assess both mid-block and intersection locations.
It can assess raised platforms, kerb extensions, median refuges, zebra crossings, signals, grade separation or combinations of these facilities.
TMR endorsed guidance
- TRUM Volume 1 Part 6, Intersections, Interchanges and Crossings, Section 8.1-1 Pedestrian crossing facility selection (Department of Transport and Main Roads, 2019)
- TRUM Volume 1 Part 5, Road Management, Section 3.3-1 Pedestrian fencing
- AS1742 Manual of uniform traffic control devices Part 10: Pedestrian control and protection
- Queensland Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices Part 10: Pedestrian control and protection (Department of Transport and Main Roads, 2017)
Other useful resources
- Australasian Pedestrian Crossing Facility Selection Tool and User Guide (Austroads, 2020)
- Guide to Traffic Management Part 5: Link Management, Section 5.5.2 Crossing Facilities (Austroads, 2020)
- Guide to Traffic Management Part 6: Intersections, Interchanges and Crossings Management, Part 9 Pedestrian and Cyclist Crossings (Austroads, 2020)
- Guide to Road Design Part 4: Intersections and Crossings – General, Section 8 Pedestrian crossings (Austroads, 2017)
- TMR Technical Training Courses: RPD308 Pedestrian Crossing Facilities and Tactile Ground Surface Indicators Design, RPD418 Designing for Pedestrians and Cyclists, RPD309 Pedestrian and Cycling Provision For Planners And Managers
- Webinar: Midblock Crossings for Pedestrians (Austroads, 2021)
Unsignalised crossings
Unsignalised crossing types include:
- pedestrian refuges
- footpath/kerb extensions
- zebra crossings
- zebra crossings on slip lanes
- wombat crossings (raised zebra crossings)
- children’s crossings
- raised priority crossings
- continuous footpath treatments (side roads)
- grade separation.
TMR endorsed guidance
- TRUM Volume 1 Part 6, Intersections, Interchanges and Crossings, Section 8.1-1 Pedestrian crossing facility selection and 8.2 Mid-block crossings (Department of Transport and Main Roads, 2019)
- Raised priority crossings for Pedestrians and Cycle Paths (Department of Transport and Main Roads, 2019)
- Queensland Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices Part 10: Pedestrian control and protection (Department of Transport and Main Roads, 2021)
- TRUM Volume 1 Part 5, Road Management, Section 3.3-1 Pedestrian fencing (Department of Transport and Main Roads, 2018)
- AS1742 Manual of uniform traffic control devices Part 10: Pedestrian control and protection
Other useful resources
- Australasian Pedestrian Crossing Facility Selection Tool and User Guide (Austroads, 2020)
- Guide to Traffic Management Part 8: Local Street Management, Section 8.5.9 Continuous footpath treatments (Austroads, 2020)
Signalised crossings
Single-stage pedestrian crossings on all legs is the recommended default provision at urban signalised intersections.
Pedestrian delay times should be minimised as far as possible. Queensland research has found pedestrian compliance is highest where the delay time is between 60 and 90 seconds. There is an almost 50% decrease in compliance for delay times exceeding this.
Signals incorporating pedestrian detection technology provide reduced delay to motorists, reduced cycle time and improved LOS for all.
TMR endorsed guidance
- TRUM Volume 1 Part 6, Intersections, interchanges and crossings, Table 8.2.1-1(2) – Benefits of treatments: traffic controlled (time separation) facilities (Department of Transport and Main Roads, 2019)
- TRUM Volume 1 Part 9 – Traffic Operations (Department of Transport and Main Roads, 2020). Sections:
- 6.5.3-4 Pedestrian protection
- 6.5.3-5 Two-aspect signal controls of pedestrian crossings on slip lanes
- 6.5.3-6 Pedestrian detectors at intersections and mid-block signalised pedestrian crossings (Smart crossings)
- 6.5.3-7 Pedestrian countdown timers
- TMR Road Safety Policy fact sheets (Department of Transport and Main Roads, 2018)
- Queensland Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices Part 10: Pedestrian control and protection (Department of Transport and Main Roads, 2021)
- Queensland Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices Part 14: Traffic signals (Department of Transport and Main Roads, 2021)
- AS/NZS1158 Part 4: Lighting of pedestrian crossings
- AS2353 Pedestrian Push-Button Assemblies
- AS1742 Manual of uniform traffic control devices Part 10: Pedestrian control and protection
- AS1742 Manual of uniform traffic control devices Part 14: Traffic signals
Other useful resources
- Guide to Road Design Part 4: Intersections and Crossings – General, Table 3.1: Considerations for road users in intersection design (Austroads, 2017)
- Case Study: Bourbong Street Smart Crossing
Operational treatments at signalised crossings
Operational treatments to reduce pedestrian delays at signalised crossings include:
- exclusive pedestrian phasing and scramble crossings
- dwell on red/dwell on green
- extended clearance and extended walk
- reduced cycle lengths and fixed demand
- isolated traffic controls
- double walk phase and late vehicle start
- pedestrian parallel walk
- setting a lower maximum cycle time
- green wave.
TMR endorsed guidance
- Technical Note TN191 Reducing Pedestrian Delays (Department of Transport and Main Roads, 2020)
- Options for Reducing Pedestrian Delays at Traffic Signals (Department of Transport and Main Roads, 2020)
Other useful resources
- Austroads Guide to Traffic Management Part 9: Transport Control Systems – Strategies and Operations Section 6.3.2 Traffic Signal Techniques to Support Road User Priorities (Austroads, 2020)
- Austroads Signal Management Techniques to Support Network Operations Appendix B, Appendix C and Signal Management Toolkit (Austroads, 2015)
Physical treatments at signalised crossings
Physical treatments to road infrastructure include:
- kerb extensions and ramps
- grade separation
- slip lane removal or signalisation
- smart crossings
- mid-block pedestrian crossings
- pedestrian countdown timers
- raised pedestrian crossings (wombat crossings).
TMR endorsed guidance
- Technical Note TN191 Reducing Pedestrian Delays (Department of Transport and Main Roads, 2020)
- Options for Reducing Pedestrian Delays at Traffic Signals (Department of Transport and Main Roads, 2020)
- RPDM Edition 2: Volume 3, Supplement to Austroads Guide to Road Design Part 4: Intersections and Crossings – General Section 8 (Department of Transport and Main Roads, 2021)
- Queensland Guide to Traffic Management (Department of Transport and Main Roads, 2022)
- TMR Standard Drawings (Department of Transport and Main Roads, 2020)
- Raised Priority Crossings for Pedestrians and Cycle Paths (Department of Transport and Main Roads, 2019)
- Bicycle Rider and Pedestrian Underpasses (Department of Transport and Main Roads, 2020)
- Options for Designers of Pedestrian and Cyclist Bridges to achieve value-for-money (Department of Transport and Main Roads, 2018)
- TMR Road Safety Policy (Department of Transport and Main Roads, 2022)
Other useful resources
- Austroads Guide to Road Design Part 4: Intersections and Crossings – General Section 8 Pedestrian Crossings (Austroads, 2017)
- Austroads Guide to Traffic Management Part 6: Intersections, Interchanges and Crossings Management Section 3.4.1 Pedestrians (Austroads, 2020)
Slip lanes
Unsignalised left turn slip lanes should generally be avoided at new intersections unless signalised with pedestrian protection.
For existing intersections with slip lanes in urban areas, road authorities may have pedestrian or combined pedestrian/vehicle volume warrants to install pedestrian crossings (zebra crossings) on slip lanes.
TMR endorsed guidance
- TMR Road Safety Policy fact sheets (Department of Transport and Main Roads, 2018)
- AS1742 Manual of uniform traffic control devices Part 10: Pedestrian control and protection, Section 6 Pedestrian crossing (zebra)
Roundabouts
Urban roundabouts should be designed with single-lane approaches and departures, splitter islands and raised crossings that give priority to people walking and riding bikes on all approaches, unless higher-order crossings that remove conflicts altogether (grade separation) are provided. Crossings that give priority to people walking and riding bikes include a raised pedestrian (zebra) crossing ('wombat' crossing) with or without a separated cycle track. (Queensland Guide to Traffic Management Part 6)
Other design features that improve the level of service and safety for pedestrians at roundabouts include:
- smaller radius entry and exit curves
- narrow traffic lane entry and exit
- splitter islands
- prohibition of parking on approaches
- pram crossings that are designed for people with a disability and/or mobility difficulty
- street lighting
- signs and vegetation located so as not to obscure ‘smaller’ pedestrians.
TMR endorsed guidance
- Queensland Guide to Traffic Management, Part 6: Intersections, Interchanges and Crossings Management (Department of Transport and Main Roads, 2023)
- Queensland RPDM, Part 4b
- Queensland MUTCD Part 10
- Providing for People Walking and Riding at Roundabouts (Department of Transport and Main Roads, 2020)
- Bicycle Crash Prediction Tool for Queensland Roundabouts (Department of Transport and Main Roads, 2020)
Other useful resources
- Guide to Traffic Management Part 6: Intersections, Interchanges and Crossings Management, Section 4, Roundabouts and 4.4.4 Pedestrians (Austroads, 2020)
- Guide to Road Design Part 4B: Roundabouts, Section 5, Pedestrian and cyclist treatments (Austroads, 2021)
Grade separations
Grade separations include:
- overpass crossings – a grade separation where a pedestrian and/or cyclist crosses over a road
- underpass crossings (often referred to as subways) – a grade separation where a pedestrian and/or cyclist path passes under a road via a culvert or structure.
Use where:
- signals are warranted but at grade crossing is inappropriate e.g. across major roads/motorways
- there are high volumes of people walking
- at a split school campus (TMR Policy).
Don't use where:
- alternative crossing treatments are feasible
- people are required to walk significant distances (out of their way) to use the facility.
TMR endorsed guidance
- Options for Designers of Pedestrian and Cyclist Bridges to achieve value-for-money (Department of Transport and Main Roads, 2018)
- Bicycle Rider and Pedestrian Underpasses (Department of Transport and Main Roads, 2020)
- Design Criteria for Bridges and Other Structures, Section 4.11.11 Barriers between active users and bridge carriageway and Section 4.16 Pedestrian bridges and velobridges for active users (Department of Transport and Main Roads, 2020)
- RPDM Edition 2: Volume 3, Supplement to Austroads Guide to Road Design Part 6A: Paths for Walking and Cycling, Section 8 paths at structures (Department of Transport and Main Roads, 2020)
- AS5100.1 – Bridge design
Other useful resources
- Guide to Road Design Part 6A: Paths for Walking and Cycling, Section 8 Paths at Structures (Austroads, 2021)
- Guide to Road Design Part 4C: Interchanges, Section 4.4 Pedestrian/Cyclist Grade Separations (Austroads, 2015)
- Guide to Traffic Management Part 6: Intersections, Interchanges and Crossings Management, Table 9.3: Benefits of treatments – grade separated (space separation) facilities (Austroads, 2020)
Railway crossings
Pedestrian crossings of suburban rail systems include:
- grade separated pedestrian crossings
- pedestrian crossings at vehicular level crossings
- pedestrian crossings at stations remote from vehicular crossings
- pedestrian crossings remote from stations or vehicular level crossings.
TMR endorsed guidance
- Guide to Development in a Transport Environment: Rail (Department of Transport and Main Roads, 2015)
Other useful resources
- Guide to Traffic Management Part 6: Intersections, Interchanges and Crossings Management, Section 8.4 Path crossings of railways (Austroads, 2020)
- Urban Design Framework (Level Crossing Removal Project Victoria, 2020)
- Last updated 6 December 2023